Experience how it's like to be one of our experts
By:
Joshua Galo
On
28/05/2024Reading time:
2 min
Summary:
Our evaluation process for each attribute was carefully crafted with input from experts in Wind Characteristics, Meteorology, Structural Engineering, GIS Mapping, City Planning and Development, and Disaster Risk Reduction and Management, resulting in a comprehensive and well-rounded set of criteria.
Are you interested to rank and compare the parameters of this study?
Participating expert’s knowledge, experience, insight, and intuition are used to rank the strength of preference on a semantic scale of 1-9. The relative intensity scale no. 1 indicates that the two criteria compared with one another are equally important. In contrast, the relative intensity scale no. 9 signifies that one criterion is more important than the other. Scales 2, 4, 6, and 8 represent the median values of the corresponding preferred values (Morales & de Vries, 2021).
Assembling a diverse AHP expert panel is essential. This group should represent various disciplines contributing to understanding wind hazards and their impact on structures. Wind engineering, meteorology, structural engineering, and geospatial analysis expertise are all valuable for capturing the multifaceted nature of wind vulnerability. Furthermore, prioritizing experts with strong academic backgrounds and proven research experience in these fields will bolster the credibility and robustness of your AHP analysis.